[ad_1]
You thought journalism was hurting? Not in any respect. Consider: a pandemic is raging, companies are being starved by lockdowns, and a complete lot of individuals don’t imagine the outcomes of the presidential election. But again on Nov. 24, USA Today had the assets to dedicate 2,300 phrases to homosexual actors complaining about straight actors getting too many queer roles.
Not that the issues of a self-obsessed subset of an insular and frivolous business aren’t fascinating. Who amongst us can’t say precisely what we have been doing after we heard the information that Selena Gomez was going to play a lesbian mountaineer?
USA Today’s David Oliver laid out the issue: “All actors should be able to play all roles, in theory, but actors and industry experts are speaking out about the need for queer and transgender actors to play roles that represent these communities.”
And the necessity is “urgent.” Oliver quoted journalist Tre’vell Anderson, “who is [redundantly] queer and transgender” saying saying each the queer and trangender issues must be addressed ASAP:
“All of those issues are important to me at once, and I think that we can advocate for all of them at once because ultimately we want our media to be an accurate reflection of the world in which we live,” they are saying.
Who’s “they?” It’s Anderson, the singular one who’s actually huge on correct reflections. We’re in pronoun playland right here.
And no one actually desires accuracy. Oliver cited numbers from GLAAD: in 2019, 18.2% of main studio releases included characters that have been “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and/or queer.” And, “On television, LGBTQ characters are projected to represent a record high of 10.2% of series regulars on prime-time scripted broadcast series.”
LGBT individuals make up 4% of the inhabitants. What they’re taking pictures for is over-representation. Yet Oliver lamented “the scarcity of roles available for out LGBTQ actors to play LGBTQ characters.” He quoted a “gender and sexuality studies professor” who says, “It would be nice if there were enough LGBT roles that anyone could play them because there wasn’t any scarcity of representation, However, that’s not the case.”
It’s an actual dilemma. You have too many queer actors in an business that’s already pushed queer content material and characters effectively past any semblance of realism.
And the person tales are harrowing: A homosexual actor who laments Hollywood’s hypocrisy “in that many attend fundraisers for the community but fail to tell LGBTQ stories with LGBTQ actors.” Or the transgender actor who “rarely gets the chance to audition for cisgender characters.”
Heartbreaking? Indeed. But so long as there are journalists like David Oliver and courageous information shops like USA Today, these victims could have a voice.
[ad_2]
Source link
