[ad_1]
The Giants caught a break, not a cross.
One of the most important performs of Sunday’s 23-19 win towards the Cowboys was a 10-yard “reception” by Dante Pettis on third-and-16 with seven minutes remaining within the fourth quarter. It arrange Graham Gano for a 50-yard area purpose that pushed the Giants’ result in 4 factors and compelled the Cowboys to play for a landing as a substitute of a area purpose when the subsequent drive reached the 7-yard line.
Except replays confirmed the tv viewers that Pettis — who additionally juggled a landing catch earlier within the sport — trapped the ball towards the turf. Had Cowboys coach Mike McCarthy thrown a problem flag, the play may need been dominated an incomplete cross, forcing an unlikely 60-yard field-goal try, a fourth-and-long prayer or a punt.
So, why didn’t the Cowboys — with all three timeouts — ask for a assessment?
“Just felt it was too close,” McCarthy mentioned. “Felt it was a bang-bang situation and the fact of the matter is we were in a tight game and the three timeouts was obviously of high value there. We just didn’t think there was enough information to overturn it.”
FOX guidelines guru Mike Pereira — a former NFL official — disagreed, saying in the course of the broadcast, “No question in my mind that if Dallas would’ve challenged this it would have been reversed to an incomplete pass.”
The Giants weren’t too involved. They didn’t rush particular groups onto the sphere to beat the clock with Gano’s franchise-record-setting thirtieth straight area purpose transformed.
“We didn’t get anything from our guys up top looking at it from a different view indicating that it might be a challenge-able type play,” coach Joe Judge mentioned. “Obviously if it was ruled incomplete, we may have played that situation a little bit differently. We wouldn’t have been in field-goal range at that point. We would’ve had to make a decision between going for it and probably punting.”
[ad_2]
Source link
