[ad_1]
MARK MEADOWS, White House chief of employees: So, Mr. President, if I, if I would be capable to bounce in, and I’ll give Brad an opportunity. Mr. Secretary, one, clearly, there’s, there are allegations the place we imagine that not each vote or truthful vote and authorized vote was, was counted. And that’s at odds with the illustration from the secretary of state’s workplace. What I’m looking forward to is there are a way that we are able to, we are able to discover some type of settlement to, to, to take a look at this just a little bit extra absolutely. As you realize, the president talked about Fulton County, however in a few of these areas the place there appears to be a distinction of the place the information appear to steer. And so, Mr. Secretary, I used to be hopeful that, you realize, in a spirit of cooperation and compromise, is there, there’s one thing that we are able to at the very least have a dialogue to take a look at a few of these allegations to discover a path ahead that’s much less litigious.
RAFFENSPERGER: Well, I’ve listened to what the president has simply stated. President Trump, we’ve had a number of lawsuits, and we’ve needed to reply in courtroom to the lawsuits and the contentions of — we don’t agree that you’ve got one. We don’t, I didn’t agree in regards to the 200,000 quantity that you simply talked about. And I am going by way of that time by level. What we had executed is we gave our State Senate about one and a half hours of, of our time going by way of the election subject by subject. And then on the State House, the Government Affairs Committee, we gave them about two and a half hours of our time, going again level by level on all the problems of competition. And then only a few days in the past, we met with our U.S. congressmen, Republican congressmen, and we gave them about two hours of our time speaking about this previous election. Going again primarily what you’re, what you’ve talked about right here, centered in on primarily, I imagine it’s the absentee poll course of, I don’t imagine that you simply’re actually questioning the Dominion machines as a result of we did a hand re-tally, a 1 % re-tally of all of the ballots and in contrast that to what the machine stated. And it got here up with nearly the identical outcome. Then we did the recount. We’ve bought nearly the identical outcome. So I, I suppose we might most likely take that off the desk. I don’t suppose there’s a difficulty about that. I believe what you have been —
TRUMP: Well, Brad, Brad, not that there’s not a difficulty, however as a result of we have now an enormous subject with Dominion and different states and maybe in yours. But we have now, we haven’t felt we wanted to go there, and simply to, you realize, possibly put just a little completely different spin on what Mark is saying. Mark Meadows. Yeah, I wish to go additional, however we don’t actually need to. We have all of the votes we’d like. You know, we received the state. If you took, these are probably the most minimal numbers, the numbers that I gave you. Those are numbers which might be licensed, your absentee ballots despatched to vacant addresses, your, your out-of-state voters, 4,925.
You know, while you add them up, it’s many extra occasions, it’s many occasions the 11,779 quantity. So we might undergo. We haven’t gone by way of your Dominion, so we are able to’t give them blessing. I imply, in different states we expect we discovered great corruption with Dominion machines, however we’ll must see. But, however we, we solely misplaced the state by 11 thous — by, by that quantity, 11,000 votes and 779. So with that being stated, with simply what we have now. And, you realize, with simply what we have now, we’re providing you with minimal, minimal numbers, we’re doing probably the most conservative numbers doable. We’re many occasions, many, many occasions above the, the margin. And so we don’t actually must, Mark — I don’t suppose we have now to undergo the machines as a result of, as a result of what’s the distinction between profitable the election by two, two votes and profitable it by half one million votes? I believe I most likely did win it by half a mill — I imply, you realize, one of many issues that occurred, Brad, is we have now different folks coming in now from Alabama and from South Carolina and from different states, and so they’re saying, ‘It’s not possible so that you can have misplaced Georgia.’ We received. You know, in Alabama, we set a file, bought the very best vote ever. In Georgia, we set a file with an enormous quantity of votes. And they are saying, ‘It’s not doable to have misplaced Georgia.’
And I might inform you by our rallies, I might inform you by the rally I’m having on Monday evening, the place, they have already got traces of individuals standing out entrance ready. It’s simply not doable to have misplaced Georgia. It’s not doable. When I heard it was shut, I stated there’s no approach. But they dropped loads of votes in there late at evening, you realize that, Brad. And that’s what we’re engaged on very, very stringently. But no matter these votes, with all of it being stated, we misplaced by 11 to — basically 11,000 votes. And we have now many extra votes already calculated and authorized too. So I simply don’t know. You know, Mark, I don’t know what’s the aim. I received’t give Dominion a move as a result of we’ve discovered too many dangerous issues. But we don’t want Dominion or the rest. We have, we have now, we have now received this election in Georgia based mostly on all of this. And there’s, there’s nothing fallacious with saying that, Brad. You know, I imply, having the, having an accurate. The folks of Georgia are indignant, and these numbers are going to be repeated on Monday evening, together with others that we’re going to have by that point, that are far more substantial even, and the folks of Georgia are indignant, the folks of the nation are indignant. And there’s nothing fallacious with saying that, you realize, um, that you simply’ve recalculated as a result of the two,236 and absentee ballots, I imply, they’re all actual numbers that have been, have been executed by accounting corporations, legislation corporations, and so on. And even when you minimize ’em in half, minimize ’em in half and minimize ’em in half once more, it’s extra votes than we’d like.
RAFFENSPERGER: Well, Mr. President, the problem that you’ve got is the information you’ve got is fallacious. We, we talked to the congressmen, and so they have been shocked. But they — I suppose, there’s an individual named Mr. Brainard that got here to those conferences and offered knowledge, and he stated that there was useless folks, I imagine it was upward of 5,000. The precise quantity have been two. Two. Two people who have been useless that voted. And so, that’s fallacious, that was two.
TRUMP: Well, Cleta, how do you reply to that? I imply, you inform me.
CLETA MITCHELL, Trump lawyer: I’ll say Mr. Secretary, one of many issues that we have now requested, and we did — What we stated was, and when you take a look at, when you learn our petition, it stated that we took the names and delivery years and, you realize, we had sure info obtainable to us. We have requested out of your workplace for data that solely you’ve got. And so we stated there’s a universe of people that have the identical identify and similar delivery 12 months and died. But we don’t have the data that you’ve got, and one of many issues that we have now been suggesting formally and informally for weeks now could be to strive, is so that you can make obtainable to us the data that may be vital to verify —
[ad_2]
Source link
