[ad_1]
One of the Tweets mentioned, “This is the biggest fraud with our country unearthed.” However, customers usually are not positive about who to carry accountable, with some believing that NCERT is to be maintain accountable. Some netizens are pointing at political events – each the UPA and the NDA.
On the opposite hand, historian Audrey Truschke has not too long ago conceded to this declare including gas to the controversy. “Aurangzeb protected more Hindu temples than he destroyed. He employed more Hindus in his imperial administration than any prior Mughal ruler by a fair margin,” mentioned the creator in an Indian Express interview.
Take a have a look at the tweets flooding the microblogging websites:
“Can’t expect better from a historian whose primary source is Wikipedia. Don’t throw Western terminological concoctions like ancient, medieval, pre-modern, modern, post-modern which have no relevance to the Orient. Issue is not Aurangzeb’s temporality but his genocidal bigotry,” tweeted former IPS officer M Nageswara Rao. Most users followed up with the NCERT RTI response to back up their comments.
Meanwhile deposing before a Parliamentary Standing Committee earlier this week, the RSS-affiliated Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas (SSUN) flagged “distortions” in NCERT’s school textbooks, which included a chapter on late artist MF Husain in the Class 11 Hindi textbook and references to Mughal rulers giving grants to support the building and maintenance of places of worship in a Class 12 History textbook, as per Indian Express report.
The committee is expected to meet again in a week to hear further depositions. “The committee had sought feedback on the topic on social media. It was through this exercise that some organizations requested to be heard in person,” said a source on the invitation extended to SSUN and BSM.
[ad_2]
Source link
