Conversations That Matter: Does it make sense to give attention to single-use plastics?

Article content material

Chris DeArmitt figures we’d be higher off specializing in paper moderately than plastic if we’re apprehensive about single-use objects.

The main plastics scientist has written “Phantom Plastics,” a e-book during which he goals to debunk prevailing ideas about plastics. He notice each the banks of Canada and England selected to print cash on plastic moderately than paper as a result of it was higher for the surroundings.

How can that be?

“Life cycle analysis is the answer,” DeArmitt says. “Plastic money has seven times the lifespan of paper money.” He says the whole carbon footprint and environmental price of paper cash far exceeds that of plastic banknotes,

Even the additional weight of the paper provides up, he says. “The extra fuel required to transport paper over plastic is just one element in the life cycle analysis of money. And then add in the impact of harvesting trees, mashing them into pulp and paper and the limited life span and it all adds up to plastic being the best choice.”