[ad_1]
Article content material continued
Doroshenko referred to her as “a Marilyn Monroe blonde bimbo,” she mentioned.
“I lost everything … my life was destroyed,” she stammered via tears. “I was rendered unemployable. I couldn’t get a job at a Dollar Store … No one should wonder if they go to work they might unexpectedly get fired and lose everything and have false allegations said about them in writing and carried on for years.”
Ojanen needs one other $161,650 to cowl the financial loss she suffered in the course of the three-year ordeal and one other $110,000 in punitive damages.
“It doesn’t even take into account how behind I am now and how behind I will be in my salary going forward — I think that’s reasonable,” Ojanen mentioned, including she was additionally carrying $100,000 in pupil debt.
The staid justices, who hardly ever hear proof a lot much less confront a distraught, weeping witness, provided nothing however help in the course of the Zoom listening to.
They helped Ojanen phrase her factors and suggested her learn how to proceed as she struggled all through an hour-long presentation in a veil of tears.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Geoffrey Gomery emphasised in his August 2019 ruling the extreme penalties that flowed from the wrongful termination.
On Sept. 10, 2016, Doroshenko found an internet site known as “BC Driving Prohibitions Blog,” which provided data his agency additionally offered on-line that he presumed Ojanen had stolen.
But he didn’t contact her or ask her concerning the website to verify his suspicions.
Instead, on Sept. 16, Doroshenko filed a lawsuit and had Ojanen served with a letter in entrance of her classmates on the Professional Legal Training Course stating: “I am terminating you for violating the Articling Agreement, deceitful conduct, and dishonesty.”
[ad_2]
Source link
