People are being compelled to journey so far as 85 miles to attend Home Office appointments through the lockdown, prompting critics to say the federal government is prioritising “distrust” of migrants over public well being.
Ministers are being urged to behave after it emerged weak asylum seekers and visa candidates have needed to take lengthy journeys on public transport in latest weeks as a way to adjust to Home Office guidelines.
In March, substantive asylum interviews – throughout which the Home Office gathers info to find out whether or not somebody must be granted asylum within the UK – have been paused in response to the pandemic.
Biometric appointments, the place UK visa candidates submit their fingerprints as a part of the applying course of, have been additionally suspended through the first lockdown as visa software centres closed.
However, each have since resumed and are persevering with to happen all through the brand new lockdown, regardless of hovering charges of coronavirus an infection.
Shadow immigration minister Holly Lynch urged the Home Office to rethink its strategy, saying: “These journeys put public health at unnecessary risk when alternatives are available. The government is asking us to stay at home, so it must also play its part.”
In the case of asylum interviews, individuals are currently being required to travel to Home Office buildings, only for the interview to then take place via video link – often with the interviewer joining from home.
A letter to an asylum seeker instructing them to attend an interview this month, seen by The Independent, states: “Your asylum interview will be conducted by video conferencing. This means that you may not be in the same room as the interviewing officer or interpreter (if you need one) but you will be able to see them.”
Immigration lawyer Christopher Desira said one of asylum clients was required to travel 25 miles this week to sit in an isolated room on video, while the Home Office interviewer asked questions from their home, and the interpreter and lawyer were present on separate video connections.
“This set up does not work well and there were a lot of misunderstandings because of poor connections,” he said.
Mr Desira said the Home Office should give asylum seekers the option of joining the call from their government accommodation or setting up a connection from their solicitor’s office, with social distancing in place.
“My view is that they don’t trust that the applicant won’t receive help or prompting during the interview, so they prefer that the applicant is under their gaze,” he said.
“If it wasn’t for that inherent suspicion there are ways to work around this, but the Home Office is putting distrust over public health.”
Melissa Rutherford, a solicitor in Glasgow, stated she has acquired eight letters from the Home Office prior to now week instructing shoppers to attend asylum interviews. Before this, she had solely acquired one such letter since 23 March.
Ms Rutherford stated her shoppers, lots of whom have skilled trauma, have been subsequently having to journey throughout Glasgow on public transport, with one weak lady having to make a two-hour journey on buses to Edinburgh.
“Lots of them are understandably very anxious and worried, particularly because the interviews are on video,” she stated. “The interviews are as early as 8:30am. Many of them don’t know where they’re going, don’t speak the language and have young kids. It’s horrific.
“I was completely shocked when I received the letters. They could have started interviewing in the summer when things seemed to be going back to normal, but they didn’t – and now all of a sudden it’s lockdown and they’re doing these video link interviews. They’ve had 10 months to think about it and work out what to do. It’s really not good enough.”
Lisa Matthews, coordinator at Right to Remain, stated that whereas it was essential to handle what she known as the appalling ready instances for asylum interviews, that “should not be at the expense of individual and public health.
She suggested that public buildings could be repurposed so that asylum seekers could access video link equipment locally, without having to travel long distances on public transport, and said that above all, they should be given the choice as to whether it is safe for them to attend.
In June, visa application centres started to re-open, but to prevent large numbers of people attending appointments the Home Office announced that applicants who had submitted their fingerprints for previous applications could reuse these rather than re-submitting them.
This has now ceased to be the case, with many individuals who have enrolled fingerprints for previous applications required to attend appointments again. The Home Office said it had reopened the service in a phased way and that it was now operating as normal.
But lawyers said they were struggling to find local appointments available on online booking system run by Sopra Steria – the private firm contracted by the Home Office in 2019 to run UK visa centres – and were subsequently having to book at faraway locations.
Mr Desira described one case of a client who recently had to travel to Southampton, 85 miles from their home.
The lawyer said: “Booking available visa centre appointments, particularly free ones, is currently a crapshoot. People have to book whatever they can even if they have to travel miles to attend it.
“You shouldn’t have to require anyone to travel during a public health crises, but if you insist upon it, the least you can do is have enough local appointments so as to reduce distance and risk.”
In one other case, Jovi Umawing, a Filipino nationwide in her forties, needed to take a 65-mile spherical journey in a taxi – at a value of £100 – as a way to submit her biometrics for an indefinite depart to stay software, regardless of having beforehand enrolled her fingerprints in each 2015 and 2018.
Ms Umawing together with her husband, Chris Boyd
(Chris Boyd)
Ms Umawing, who additionally paid £200 for her appointment as a result of there have been no free ones obtainable, stated travelling to Manchester was a extremely hectic expertise. “If I hadn’t been able to get a taxi, the journey would’ve required multiple trains and buses there and back, which seems needlessly risky,” she stated.
“We couldn’t put off the appointment until a later date, as we didn’t know if all services would be shut down again as they were in 2020.”
Another visa applicant, Niki Sol, a college lecturer who moved from the US to the UK in 2010, was advised in early January that she would want to journey from her dwelling city Cambridge to Croydon – a two-hour drive – to enrol her fingerprints for her software.
Ms Sol, who had already submitted this info to the Home Office quite a few instances, stated: “I have to travel all this way to give them information they already have, which is frustrating. I’m grateful that I can drive and won’t have to take the train.”
The 40-year-old, who has had to find cover at work on the day of the appointment, said: “It’s bureaucracy at its best – and at its worst as well because of everything else going on and the government telling us we need to stay at home. It contradicts what they’re telling us to do.”
Future borders and immigration minister Kevin Foster stated: “Asylum interviews are a critical public service given it is a vital part of ensuring we can consider the relevant application and therefore applicants have an exemption to travel, which stakeholders were made aware of.
“We have kept stakeholders fully informed and where a customer is unable to travel to an appointment because of Covid, either due to health or logistics, we encourage them to contact the Coronavirus Immigration Helpline who can assist.”
UK information in photos
Show all 50
A Sopra Steria spokesperson stated the closure of visa purposes through the first wave of the pandemic had led to a pent-up demand for the service and that protecting coronavirus measures meant it was providing fewer appointments.
“In order to create more capacity to service the demand, we have opened many more centres across the UK and extended opening hours, but this does mean that in some cases applicants may need to travel greater distances to secure an appointment,” they stated.
The spokesperson stated that the service now had higher capability than earlier than the pandemic, with a major variety of free appointments obtainable, however that the corporate understood that these weren’t at all times obtainable to fulfill everybody’s fast necessities.
