Still somehow Manchin insists that GOP lawmakers at the federal level are both interested in and fundamental to playing a corrective role to their counterparts in the states.
In Iowa, where one of this session’s most restrictive bills passed on a party-line vote, Jennifer Konfrst, Democratic whip in the Iowa House of Representatives, is practically tearing out her hair over Manchin’s intransigence.
“It is unfathomable to me that we would look at this issue and say we have to bring Republicans along, in this political climate, in order to make true change,” Konfrst old The Atlantic‘s Ron Brownstein. “I don’t see anywhere where Republicans are inviting Democrats along, or inviting Democrats to the table. Why are some Democrats saying ‘I won’t do this unless it’s bipartisan?’”
Here’s a snapshot of the Brennan Center findings courtesy of Brownstein:
- 14 states have passed 24 laws restricting voting access so far this year (with dozens still pending in another 18 states)
- 17 of those passed in nine states are deemed “highly restrictive” by the Brennan Center
- All nine of those states are under unified GOP control with the exception of Kansas, where Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed the law only to be overridden by the Republican-dominated state legislature
- No Democrat co-sponsored any of the 17 bills
- Not one Democrat voted for 13 of those 17 laws. Another three of those laws drew support from a single lonely Democratic lawmaker in the legislatures of Arkansas, Montana, and Wyoming. (The only highly restrictive bill to receive meaningful Democratic support was a voter ID law enacted in Arkansas)
- Among all the state House/Assembly Republicans who voted on these 17 bills, just 12 of 1,143 voted against them; among state Senate Republicans, just seven of 458 voted no on them.