[ad_1]
Over a thousand employees at The New York Times will go on strike on Thursday over contract negotiations.
In a tweet, The New York Times Guild, which represents the information outlet’s employees, stated: “Today we were ready to work for as long as it took to reach a fair deal, but management walked away from the table with five hours to go. It’s official: @NYTimesGuild members are walking out for 24 hours on Thursday. We know what we’re worth.”
This would be the first time that journalists from the outlet go on strike since 1981, when there was a strike of lower than a day.
The strike, which incorporates about 1,100 staff as signatories, comes after negotiations between the Guild and the NYT administration broke down.
According to a report by the outlet, the contract between The Times and The New York Times Guild expired in March 2021 and about 40 bargaining classes have been held since.
The guild consists of 1,450 staff within the newsroom, promoting and different areas of the corporate out of the over 1,800 individuals employed by the NYT.
“Negotiators have failed to come to an agreement on salaries, health and retirement benefits, and other issues,” the report stated.
The union stated the administration’s response had not met financial considerations.
“Their wage proposal still fails to meet the economic moment, lagging far behind both inflation and the average rate of wage gains in the US,” the union stated in its announcement.
In a observe to the newsroom, government editor Joe Kahn stated he was disillusioned.
“Strikes typically happen when talks deadlock. That is not where we are today,” Mr Kahn stated. “While the company and the News Guild remain apart on a number of issues, we continue to trade proposals and make progress toward an agreement.”
Union members have been provided a 5.5 per cent increase upon ratification of the contract, 3 per cent raises in 2023 and 2024, and a 4 per cent retroactive bonus to compensate for an absence of raises for the reason that contract expired, in accordance with the report.
The union’s proposal included a ten per cent increase upon ratification, 5.5 per cent raises in 2023 and 2024, and an 8.5 per cent retroactive bonus.
In addition, different points included talks round return-to-work insurance policies and the corporate’s efficiency score system for workers.
“As of tonight, the company continues to run employees’ health funds at a loss. Management continues to refuse the $65k salary floor proposed by the Times Guild and their wage proposal still fails to meet the economic moment, lagging far behind both inflation and the average rate of wage gains in the US,” stated the guild in a press release.
“Over the life of the contract, their offer now amounts to an annual raise of only 2.875 per cent,” it added.
Meredith Kopit Levien, NYT’s chief government, defended the corporate in an electronic mail to staff and stated the “drastic action” by the guild was “disappointing”.
She stated within the electronic mail that “one of our negotiating principles is to ensure that we can continue to invest in the best newsroom in the world”.
“Those investments are possible because of the great care we’ve taken as a company over the last decade to work our way back to economic growth in a radically transforming industry.
“We’ve done so by making financial decisions that are sustainable not just in the moment, but for years to come,”
[ad_2]
Source link
