Republican Lawmakers Divided On Election Certification

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is seen throughout a Senate Judiciary Committee listening to in November. Cruz and several other different Republicans are calling for a fee to analyze unfounded claims of election fraud.

Hannah McKay/Pool/AFP through Getty Images

disguise caption

toggle caption

Hannah McKay/Pool/AFP through Getty Images

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is seen throughout a Senate Judiciary Committee listening to in November. Cruz and several other different Republicans are calling for a fee to analyze unfounded claims of election fraud.

Hannah McKay/Pool/AFP through Getty Images

A battle is looming between congressional Republicans who plan to object to the certification of November’s presidential election outcomes, and others who imagine Congress wants to just accept the need of the voters.

At least 12 Republican senators, and dozens of Republican members of the House of Representatives, have stated they’ll object to the certification of the presidential election outcomes when Congress formally counts the electoral votes on Wednesday, citing unfounded claims of election fraud.

The plan has been met with disdain from some influential Republicans and most Democrats. There has been no proof of widespread election fraud.

But on Fox News on Sunday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz tried to drum up help for the creation of a fee to analyze claims of voter fraud, which he stated have “produced a deep, deep distrust of our democratic process across the country.” Cruz argued that each one members of Congress have “an obligation to do something about that.”

Every courtroom to look at the allegations of fraud have discovered them to be unfounded. Former Attorney General Bill Barr additionally stated federal authorities have not uncovered any widespread fraud that may have affected the end result of the election.

Cruz dismissed Barr’s feedback. “Bill Barr was speaking as to the evidence the Department of Justice saw,” he stated. “The Department of Justice wasn’t administering any elections, did not have access to particularly widespread evidence on either side of the issue.”

Cruz acknowledged that he and his Republican supporters “don’t want to be in a position where we’re suggesting setting aside the results of an election just because the candidate that we supported didn’t happen to prevail; that’s not a principled constitutional position.”

Cruz stated it is essential that an electoral fee examine potential fraud — if for no different purpose than to reassure the 39% of individuals in a November Reuters/Ipsos ballot who fear that the election was “rigged.”

“That’s bad for our democracy,” Cruz stated. “That’s bad for the legitimacy of any subsequent presidential elections. And so dismissing these claims, I think, does real violence to our democratic system.”

And if an investigative fee finds proof of fraud vital sufficient to have an effect on the ends in a specific state? “Then those election results would have to be set aside,” Cruz stated.

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who helps the creation of an electoral fee, informed NBC’s Meet the Press that when tens of tens of millions of individuals do not belief the outcomes of an election, it is essential that lawmakers guarantee all the pieces was above board.

“We are not acting to thwart the democratic process; we are acting to protect it,” he stated.

But most Republican senators imagine it is time to transfer on. In a bipartisan assertion Sunday, 4 Republicans joined a number of Democratic senators in arguing that Congress should fulfill its accountability to the voters and certify the election outcomes.

“The voters have spoken, and Congress must now fulfill its responsibility to certify the election results,” learn the assertion, which was co-signed by Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, and Mitt Romney of Utah. Several Democratic senators and unbiased Sen. Angus King additionally signed on.

Some Republican senators wrote individually to precise their alarm over the proposal. “The egregious ploy to reject electors may enhance the political ambition of some, but dangerously threatens our Democratic Republic,” Romney stated in an announcement Saturday. “The congressional power to reject electors is reserved for the most extreme and unusual circumstances. These are far from it.”

Romney criticized Cruz and others for claiming {that a} congressionally directed election audit would restore belief within the election. “Nonsense,” Romney stated. “Members of Congress who would substitute their own partisan judgment for that of the courts do not enhance public trust, they imperil it.”

In her separate assertion Saturday, Murkowski urged her colleagues to certify the electoral votes at once. “The courts and state legislatures have all honored their duty to hear legal allegations and have found nothing to warrant overturning the results,” she said.

Speaking to reporters Sunday, Collins pointed to the handfuls of lawsuits filed by the administration — none of which have discovered any compelling proof of voter fraud that might have made a distinction within the end result of the election. “From my perspective, the election is over,” Collins stated. “The courts have spoken. The administration was given every opportunity to pursue its legal remedies, and it’s time to move on.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham stated on Twitter Sunday that he’ll “listen closely” to his colleagues’ objections to certifying the election outcomes, however they’ve a “high bar” to clear.

Graham opposes the creation of an investigative physique. “Proposing a commission at this late date — which has zero chance of becoming reality — is not effectively fighting for President Trump,” he said. “It appears to be more of a political dodge than an effective remedy.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has additionally stated he opposes intervening within the outcomes.