[ad_1]
“There’s a lot that you can do with the money that’s sitting at DOE,” said Dan Reicher, who ran DOE’s energy efficiency and renewable energy office under President Bill Clinton, and jokingly refers to the agency as “the Department of Everything.”
The $40 billion in DOE loan guarantee money is just a small fraction of the trillions of dollars needed to meet Biden’s goals of achieving net-zero emissions on the power grid by 2035 and economy-wide by 2050. And the omnibus spending package passed by Congress shifted some funding inside DOE, boosting money for clean energy research and a home weatherization program, while rescinding $1.9 billion under a loan program for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing.
To run his Energy Department, Biden has tapped former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a staunch clean energy advocate who worked closely with the Obama administration to bail out her state’s auto industry during the Great Recession — a program that also directed stimulus funds to build the LG Chem facility there that produces batteries for the Chevy Volt.
“Granholm was really good on this stuff when she was governor. She’s been even more engaged on the climate fights since she left,” said John Podesta, the former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton who later led Obama administration climate efforts. “She still has very strong connections to unions, to the auto companies.”
Granholm is already leaning into her argument that a clean energy transition can help the U.S. economy — and blue collar workers — weather the economic turmoil from the pandemic.
“We’re going to be working at the Department of Energy with the … states and the cities, to help give them incentives, little carrots, little sticks,” Granholm told ABC’s “This Week,” on Dec. 20, adding that “combating climate change is such an economic opportunity for this country.”
Clean energy experts and Obama administration veterans say DOE can play a crucial role in shaping the Biden climate plan through its research capacity, appliance standards setting, modeling capabilities and grants.
Clean energy investment has been a rare area of bipartisan agreement in recent years, and Congress’s omnibus package hiked funding for research into energy storage and to advance carbon capture, utilization and storage technology, as well as the work conducted by DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.
While DOE research spending hit $9.5 billion in 2018, overall science spending across the federal government of 0.6 percent of GDP is well below the historical average of 1 percent, according to a September report from the research group Breakthrough Energy. That report also found that federal research spending offered significant benefits for employment, yielding 2.7 indirect jobs for every direct job it created.
Josh Freed, who leads the climate and energy at think tank Third Way, agreed with those jobs findings, and said increasing funding and focus on DOE’s network of 17 national labs could help create pockets of employment around the country that build buy-in for a clean energy transition.
But Danny Kennedy, the chief energy officer at incubator New Energy Nexus, said the federal government in general has failed to prioritize bringing new technology to market at scale. The Biden administration, he said. will need a coordinated strategy to deploy technologies like new batteries, which will be key for expanding the market for electric vehicles and renewable power.
“It’s chump change. This is sort of basic stuff,” he said, referring to current funding. “We’re spending diddly squat on commercializing it.”
Developing that battery technology will be a central focus for DOE, Reicher said, as will offshore wind power, which could deliver loads of new electricity into coastal cities more easily than building long high-voltage power lines from the country’s interior.
“We are regularly losing our lead in many of these clean energy technologies that we invented in the United States, often at the taxpayer expense,” said Reicher, now a senior researcher at the Stanford University Woods Institute for the Environment.
The incoming Biden administration has an opportunity to drive new manufacturing by updating appliance standards coming out of DOE, which would reduce save energy and reduce emissions while pushing up demand for new equipment. DOE also will fund research into technologies such as electric heat pumps that would replace natural gas-powered systems, helping cut the emissions from the nation’s 70 million homes and businesses that contribute 14 percent of U.S. greenhouse gases.
Jacob Corvidae, a principal at the Rocky Mountain Institute, noted the department is currently researching materials that better insulate homes while simultaneously bringing in construction and manufacturing firms to learn about the new opportunities. Some ideas, such as manufactured walls that slap onto the exterior of existing homes, could lead to a building boom, he said, and DOE can even set model building codes for state and local governments to help speed a drop in carbon emissions.
Even nuts-and-bolts functions, such as modeling performed by DOE’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, can help regional power grids better plan where to set up new electricity storage and generation sources that deliver outsize value for reducing emissions, said Katie Jereza, who was deputy assistant secretary for transmission permitting and technical assistance at DOE under Trump.
The same can be done to help determine where to site electric vehicle charging infrastructure, which will help meet Biden’s pledge to roll out more than 500,000 new plug-in stations to facilitate sales of electric vehicles, said Jereza, who now is vice president for external relations and communications at the Electric Power Research Institute.
But at an more basic level, the new tone that the Biden administration has set for climate science after years of deregulation and dismissal of the problem by the Trump administration will in itself yield benefits.
“You will have a Department of Energy and national labs and every single career government official and appointee driven by data and simply allowed to do their jobs,” Freed said. “I think that we have completely underestimated how detrimental four years of malign neglect and misinformation in government has hampered agencies like DOE.”
[ad_2]
Source link