[ad_1]
Article content continued
“My phone and email hasn’t stopped since that committee meeting, a lot of people in Southwood Lakes are upset,” said Ward 1 Coun. Fred Francis, who represents the distinctive lake-dotted subdivision and was the only member of the environment, public safety and transportation standing committee to vote against the deferral. He presented Chisholm’s petition to council on Monday.
People are upset, he said, because they don’t understand why the existing standard — ornamental light posts which the city originally approved as part of the subdivision plan more than three decades ago — aren’t being maintained. He noted that ornamental posts in core neighbourhoods are replaced as a matter of course.
“Unless the city is prepared to take decorative lamps out of Ward 9, Ward 4 (Walkerville and Erie Street), Ward 6 (Riverside), Ward 7, Ward 3 (downtown), Ward 2 (Sandwich), then I don’t know why they’re prepared to take them out of South Windsor in Ward 1,” Francis said.
“I just don’t think it’s fair.”
The committee raised the question as to whether Windsor taxpayers should shoulder the extra costs of replacing ornamental posts in these select neighbourhoods, or just pay the cost of the standard poles which most others get. The recommended deferral still must be endorsed by city council.
Chisholm, the former owner of Rose City Ford who now operates a consulting business, said he expects many of his neighbours will accompany him to that meeting.
[ad_2]
Source link